Do you have a few minutes?
Simple actions for everybody
A subscriber brought the following item to Your Author’s attention:
Apparently the Congressional Democratic Women’s Caucus wants to hear from us! How strange. They refused to meet with WoLF when we were in DC this May. NOW they want to hear from us?!
Here is the link to their survey. Please take a few minutes and tell the DWC that you are appalled that they deny the reality of biological sex, oppose women’s sex-based rights, and endorse sex-trait alterations for minors. Even if you are not a Democrat, please complete this brief survey. Tell the DWC that you will NOT vote for a Democrat until they come to their senses and rejoin the 79% of American voters who oppose gender ideology. Dear Readers, our opponents are communicating with our reps, so we must as well.
Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats filed a godawful amicus brief in the two upcoming SCOTUS cases of men in women’s sports. Read it. It’s disgusting. It employs all the pro-trans tropes that sex-realists and scientists have repeatedly debunked.
Scroll to the Appendix. There you will see the list of signers, all of whom are Democrats. Only nine US senators signed, including the DWC chairwoman. Note that PA Senator John Fetterman did not sign this brief. Some sex-realists have speculated that since Senator Fetterman was hospitalized after his fall, he either didn’t see the brief or didn’t get a chance to sign it. Regardless, since he and his staff are misogynists, his signature’s absence is notable.
A total of 121 Democratic US representatives signed, including, sadly, many PA members.
Democrats for an Informed Approach to Gender (DIAG) asks us to contact our members of Congress who signed the brief. Tell them that we — their constituents and voters — oppose their attempts to undermine the original intent of Title IX and destroy the fundamental integrity, dignity, and safety of women’s athletics. Please contact your reps!! Trans agitators are definitely doing so! Our members of Congress need to hear from ALL their sex-realist constituents regardless of party affiliation!
At the above link, DIAG has two sample messages. Please personalize them as you wish.
Sample 1 (short and sweet):
Dear [Senator/Representative]: I am dismayed that you signed onto an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to rule in favor of trans-identifying male plaintiffs who want to compete in female sport. Such a ruling would effectively mean the end of female sport. Your signature on the amicus brief betrays female athletes and the original intent of Title IX, and it imperils the electability of Democrats.
Sample 2 (impassioned and detailed):
Dear [Senator/Representative]: I am writing to express my dismay at your signature on an amicus brief filed to the Supreme Court on behalf of trans-identifying males who want to play in female sport. The brief states that banning these plaintiffs from girls’ teams undermines their ability to be part of their school community. No one is banning the plaintiffs from school athletics. They can compete on the boys’ teams. Bodies matter in sport and male bodies have a clear physiological advantage. “Gender identity”—that is, a person’s entirely subjective sense of self—is irrelevant. If any trans-identifying males are allowed to compete against girls, then the category of female sport ceases to exist—in violation of Title IX. Your signature on the amicus brief is, in effect, a call to violate women’s rights.
Your stance on this issue is not only terrible policy, but suicidal politics. Why are you taking a position that 79% of the public, including 67% of Democrats, sensibly oppose? In 2024, Democrats’ preoccupation with advancing unreasonable demands from the transgender lobby helped put Donald Trump in the White House. Now, at this perilous time when Trump and his GOP enablers are upending our Constitutional order, you seem less interested in fighting for the broad body politic than in virtue signaling to a niche identity group. This is what has made the Democratic brand toxic to so many lifelong Democrats like myself.
Please read the original amicus brief Appendix to find your rep. DIAG missed at least one from PA in their list.
Dear Readers, if you have news tips, action alerts, or want to write guest posts, please let PA4SBR know! We welcome contributions!
Today’s lagniappe is this amazing photo — the first photo ever of a skydiver in freefall against our Sun as a backdrop. The photographer succeeded on his sixth attempt:
h/t: anonymous subscriber, WoLF, DIAG, various sciencey sites for the photo
That meme is so apropos. Every time one of my students comes out as "trans" they pause and expectantly wait for me to praise them. I treat them normally, and they get crestfallen. The girls also often come out with various other diagnosis and many of them now have canes and wheelchairs. And what is worse, the other students on campus have recognized that they don't need the canes and/or wheelchairs and that is absolutely ghastly disabled people. It's a nightmare. Although, to be fair, some disabled students also fall for the trans stuff.
Okay, end of tangent. I'll be writing and emailing.
Hi, there: I just went back and rechecked our list. The total count is correct, and we ID’d only 4 PA reps as Hecox signers. Though our little volunteer team worked quite hard to make sure we ID’d each person to the correct district, it’s possible an additional PA rep is ID’d to the wrong state, so if you could please let me know who you see as missing, I’ll make sure and pass it on to be corrected. Thanks!