The American woman speaking is Heather Heying, and I think the other woman is the Helen Pluckrose.
It sounds like the female student thinks Heather is saying that the difference between men and women means that women are inferior, whereas, to some radical feminists, it means the inverse and to evolutionary biologists such as Heather Heying, it is just a neutral fact.
Do you have any concerns that H.R. 2616 would cement the idea that it is okay for schools to refer to students with opposite-sex pronouns and let them use opposite-sex restrooms at all? I understand the concern behind the bill, but as a parent, my #1 priority is to keep boys out of the girls' restroom and locker room altogether. Of course, I hate the fact that the boys might be there behind their parents' backs, but even with their parents' full consent, I don't want it.
Your IDs agree with others I found online, Tracye.
Re HR 2616, at least it's something. I think its purpose is to stop or at least minimize teachers who "socially transition" kids without their parents' knowledge. As we know, this is happening all over the country. Here's what GAG's post says: "While our organization does not support the transition of any minor, schools that keep secrets about a child’s transition also rob the rights of parents who would support their child’s transition... The bill is currently in committee. Gays Against Groomers wholeheartedly supports this bill as it would force schools to communicate with parents about any child’s wish to transition and allow parents to discuss any transition wishes with their child and an outside doctor, therapist, or other professional. Every parent deserves the right to know what the taxpayer-funded public school in their community is teaching their children. This bill would break the tendency of public schools to keep discussions of gender identity and social transition secret from parents."
Maybe HR 2616 combined with HR 2378's definitions will finally stop males from invading female facilities and services.
The American woman speaking is Heather Heying, and I think the other woman is the Helen Pluckrose.
It sounds like the female student thinks Heather is saying that the difference between men and women means that women are inferior, whereas, to some radical feminists, it means the inverse and to evolutionary biologists such as Heather Heying, it is just a neutral fact.
Do you have any concerns that H.R. 2616 would cement the idea that it is okay for schools to refer to students with opposite-sex pronouns and let them use opposite-sex restrooms at all? I understand the concern behind the bill, but as a parent, my #1 priority is to keep boys out of the girls' restroom and locker room altogether. Of course, I hate the fact that the boys might be there behind their parents' backs, but even with their parents' full consent, I don't want it.
Your IDs agree with others I found online, Tracye.
Re HR 2616, at least it's something. I think its purpose is to stop or at least minimize teachers who "socially transition" kids without their parents' knowledge. As we know, this is happening all over the country. Here's what GAG's post says: "While our organization does not support the transition of any minor, schools that keep secrets about a child’s transition also rob the rights of parents who would support their child’s transition... The bill is currently in committee. Gays Against Groomers wholeheartedly supports this bill as it would force schools to communicate with parents about any child’s wish to transition and allow parents to discuss any transition wishes with their child and an outside doctor, therapist, or other professional. Every parent deserves the right to know what the taxpayer-funded public school in their community is teaching their children. This bill would break the tendency of public schools to keep discussions of gender identity and social transition secret from parents."
Maybe HR 2616 combined with HR 2378's definitions will finally stop males from invading female facilities and services.